From Phonographs to Spotify: A Brief History of the Music Industry

September 11, 2019 18 Comments


What happens when you take one of the
most-streamed songs of all time, say, Drake’s “One Dance,” and record it onto the oldest format of recorded music: a wax cylinder. Okay stop, not great. But
fast-forward to today and a lot has changed. We no longer really own music,
you just stream it. Streaming is almost entirely responsible for getting the
industry back on track, but the question is now: can streaming take it back to its
heyday after fundamentally changing the way we consume it? Maybe. But first let’s look at how we got here. So back to that phonograph. This was
the start of it all. Mary had a little lamb, its fleece was white as snow. And everywhere that Mary went, the lamb was sure to go Thomas Edison’s invention meant that for the first time
people could listen to music from the comfort of their homes, and it could also
be shared and sold. As the phonograph’s popularity grew a few enterprising
Americans came together to form what is now known today as Columbia Records. Over the next five decades, the phonograph took different forms from this cylinder
shape to flat disks until finally being replaced by In 1948, Columbia Records introduced the
long-play, allowing for multiple songs on one record. Vinyl remained the dominant
recording format for most of the 20th century As rock and roll, blues and
country kicked off sales boomed, and albums sold out. But by the late 50s, new
technology would again rock the industry. When first introduced the RCA magnetic
tape wasn’t a game changer, but being able to record music on a smaller device
for greater portability inspired a series of innovation. Adoption by car
makers ensured a quick rise in the tape’s popularity, and by the late 60s, most cars
offered 8-track players. For the first first time driving down the interstate
and listening to, say, the Beatles, was possible. Road trips got a whole lot more
exciting, but it would be Sony that changed the game with the iconic, yes. With the Walkman listeners could take music with them with them whenever and wherever. Around the same time, MTV launched, giving record labels an opportunity to market their
music. For artists, that meant it wasn’t just
about the song anymore, but the ability to offer a whole artistic package. And
that became a big focus for icons like Madonna and Michael Jackson. But with the rise of the digital era came the unraveling of the cassette tape. Thanks to
booming CD sales, the music industry parties like it was, yeah, 1999. Profits
peaked that year with $14.6 billion in sales
in the U.S. alone. There was Nirvana and Tupac The Spice Girls,
Oasis, Backstreet Boys, Britney, Mariah and Selena. Unfortunately you can only party
like it’s 1999 for so long. software like Software like Napster paved the way for a new era of piracy. CD sales plummeted as more and more people logged on. Free music didn’t
sit well with the music industry, and they fought long and expensive legal
battles, eventually seeing some sites shut down. But the damage had already
been done. Sharing music over the Internet was here to stay. I’ve got an iPod here. And true, with the introduction of the iPod and mp3 players, the industry
did see a boost from digital downloads, but it wasn’t enough to make up for the
dwindling physical format sales And artists were forced to tour more to
bring in the dough. Meanwhile streaming was just getting started. Some companies introduced subscription models with limited music libraries,
while others, like Pandora, operated as internet radio stations with ads. But the
breakthrough came in 2011. Swedish startup Spotify managed to do what the
others could not–license a vast library of music. Instead of buying and owning
the songs and albums, we started listening to ads or paying monthly fees
in exchange for access to essentially all the music in the world. Over the
following years, there was an explosion of services artists and labels now count
on these services for the bulk of their profits from recorded music, while many
argue that artists are not being paid enough.
Although streaming is responsible for huge revenue growth in the industry,
tech companies aren’t yet making money from it, and it’s still not clear how
they will, as they continue to prioritize growth over profits. Plus, if history is
any clue, it won’t be long before new technology shakes everything up again.

18 Replies to “From Phonographs to Spotify: A Brief History of the Music Industry”

  1. Nah!!Hey!HEY,hooray! James says:

    G.morning to ALL

  2. Nazrin Latiff says:

    what?!

  3. Honky Tonk says:

    All of my favorite music listening is on Youtube.

  4. Basti Ricafrente says:

    Sick tits

  5. 525Lines says:

    33 1/3 rpm vinyl disks came out earlier, during WW2, as victory disks, meant to distribute popular music to US troops as a way to help morale.

  6. please don't subscribe says:

    pornographs

  7. Dexter James says:

    WSJ has expended it's resources to make people be aware and think. Make that money from advertisement at the same time.

  8. Rated K says:

    perfect video for my music final in 2 days

  9. Blu Regard says:

    How much did spotify pay for this ad?

  10. Becoming Vincent says:

    You say something could replace streaming. Any ideas ? Also I believe artists make more money touring than with royalties

  11. moyah says:

    https://open.spotify.com/track/5K8qJ61MKFOKdNvZqsJnF3?si=kENN2-lmQwWhFiyJBmr2zw&fo=1

  12. allthingsbgi says:

    great video!

  13. Timothy Nickles 2 the VHS fan says:

    I download my music and I use cassette tapes and maybe one day vinyl

  14. Adnane Hajjiya says:

    Maybe Vinyl Or Cd will come back

  15. Dan Cantillo says:

    Oh mama… you mean dear mama?

  16. LOUIS XVII says:

    Selena doesn’t count. She didn’t matter until the movie.

    Clearly this video is racist.

  17. True____Alpha says:

    The only thing I trust from WSJ

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *